If President George W. Bush has no problem with violating the United States Constitution...Well, why hasn't "the Decider" chosen to do that? He's definitely shown that he has no problem with abusing power and authority after all... so why not abuse it for good?...and if he is supposed to be against abortion...
...then why hasn't Bush brazenly violated Roe v. Wade and ended abortion in this country once and for all?
Could it be that Bush just doesn't care about abortion?
2 comments:
Ha, good question.
It's well known in the "un-approved" or "non-National Right To Life" prolife movement that Bush isn't prolife, he's just using that to get votes.
When you think about it, the National Right to Life folks have a lot to lose if Roe v. Wade was revoked. Like, their six-digit salaries, supported by donations from deluded people who think the partial-birth abortion ban actually stopped any abortions.
Interesting stuff - maybe you could elaborate on the question you posed above sometime.
Working on it right now :-)
And you're right: there are some people who in spite of their public image, they do NOT want Roe done away with: too much money and affluence they get from opposing it.
Money really is the great corrupter, isn't it? :-(
Post a Comment