Wednesday, August 02, 2023
All that I will likely say about former President Donald Trump being indicted
Tuesday, September 25, 2018
Chris addresses the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation and declares war against hate at Elon University... with his FIFTH article for American Thinker!
This past week has seen the writing of my second-ever work of short story fiction (while stranded in a motel room along with Tammy the Pup during Hurricane Florence) after trying for decades to crack that art, work begun on a one-act play, finally started plotting a children's book(?!?). And now, it's article #5 written for American Thinker!
Has the Muse roared back from her exile, or what? For awhile I thought she had gone sailing off the cliff in a convertible accompanied by Dignity a'la Thelma and Louise, but anyhoo...
"There's Poisoning the Well, and Then There's Borking the Well" is my take on the Brett Kavanaugh nomination for the United States Supreme Court. However, that's just the peripheral matter of a way bigger issue: that for sake of partisan power there are some - and I'm looking at you in particular, Senator Feinstein - who are enthusiastically willing to trample upon a millennia of legal tradition in abandoning the rule of law. And when that is allowed to transpire, all of us as a people suffer its consequences.
From the article:
The machinations currently deployed against Brett Kavanaugh stem from a heart of darkest cowardice. If his detractors cannot prevail on purely rational and intellectual grounds, then they will do so playing to the basest hysteria and hate. There will be no satisfying their bloodlust until Kavanaugh's haggard, weary face is up on the telescreens, accusing himself of crimes against Big Sister that he never committed. So it is that the yet to be substantiated claims of Ford and Ramirez are now enough, we are told, to override fair and due process. Strangely, this principle never seemed applicable to Juanita Broaddrick, but I digress.But... that's not all, folks! Because something else gets touched on in my new article and this one is much more personal.
It is this: that in the article I'm calling attention to the fact that Elon University - the college I could once be proud to call myself an alumnus of - is now harboring, employing and celebrating someone who has been taking an active part in the harassment of many innocent people, for no reason other than their holding to political beliefs she does not agree with.
Megan Squire, an Elon computer sciences professor, was revealed earlier this year to be an Antifa activist. She is, for all intents and purposes, an enabler of domestic terrorism.
Yeah, I said it. I went there. And from where I'm sitting it's plenty enough cause for myself and other alumni to withhold our contributions to Elon.
Again from the article:
The ol' alma mater already lost my contributions earlier this year – a consequence of Wired revealing that one of Elon's computer professors is Antifa activist who has been compiling a massive database of anyone she deems Lebensunwertes Leben. That means "Republicans," "conservatives," "Alt-Right," "white supremacists," and pretty much everyone listing starboard of Friedrich Engels.As ever, in conveying my thoughts for publication I do my best to steer away from partisan labels and identity politics. As I told a colleague today: "I deal in ideas, not ideologies."
Megan Squire is not only still employed at Elon, but applauded. Last week Squire delivered a "Distinguished Scholar Lecture" about her work supplying the Southern Poverty Law Center with information about their common enemies. This is the same Southern Poverty Law Center whose "hate list" has been used to target innocent people for assassination. Curiously, Squire's work is totally absent any analogues from the left of the political spectrum. A "scholarly oversight," no doubt.
Once upon a time, Elon University was a place that encouraged freedom of ideas and vigorous debate. But as ideological homogeneity has prevailed upon "the most beautiful campus in America," that time is now past. The school that welcomed Margaret Thatcher to dedicate its student center in 1995 would probably have the Iron Lady arrested for trespassing were she still with us.
In good conscience, I can no longer contribute to a school that has embraced intellectual intolerance and has abandoned reason for capricious "feelings." Neither can I endorse my college when it continues to have among its staff a gleeful provider of resources for domestic terrorism. But still, I held out hope that sanity there might yet prevail.
But regardless of where you're coming from on the political spectrum, I like to believe that very, very few of us are comfortable with the knowledge that anyone is being targetted for harassment, intimidation and much worse because of their opinions.
Does Megan Squire believe herself justified in painting her enemies in such broad strokes? Is she a fitting representative of the Elon University community in doing so?
Regardless of whether she does, well... I've no other way to put this. At times I have encountered truly hate-filled people. Like neo-Nazis (got shot at by a gang of them) and the Westboro Baptist Church (had to spent several hours with them one hot summer night in a small television studio).
From where I'm sitting, there is not a shred of difference between the "God Hates Fags" idiots and Megan Squire. One just happens to have a computer science education and a better web page. And also potentially has had her work lead to the injury of others if not worse.
When the objective is hatred, the semantics matter none. And there can be no excuse or justifying that hatred.
So, President Connie Ledoux Book and the trustees of Elon University: in keeping with the school's expressed beliefs in diversity of ideas and backgrounds and that the school should be a safe environment... when are you going to dismiss Dr. Megan Squire from the computer sciences department?
Because having a hate-filled extremist in your faculty, and one so enthusiastically applying her work toward damaging and destroying the lives of others, is the kind of thing that - not to put too fine a point on it - might dry up the alumni contributions. It sure has mine. Having seen some of Dr. Squire's Twitter account, I cannot understand how anyone's life can contain so much anger and hatred. Much less that of a Ph.D.
As far as Squire's work from a purely academic perspective is concerned: she may be brilliant at Python databases but the bias factor of the data itself is so irredeemably out of whack that it's utterly useless beyond a political agenda. Raw data is supposed to be neutral, impartial, agnostic... and Squire's methodology is a betrayal of all of that and more. In short: she is not a serious scholar. That alone would merit reconsidering her status as a member of the faculty.
Having such a malicious person intent upon causing grief to others certainly does not reflect well at all on whatever vestige of Christian values remain from the college's founding under the oaks in 1889.
Which is more important: the reputation and integrity of an institution that many of us still hold dear in our hearts and memories? Or protecting an enabler of domestic terrorism out of some passing fad of "resistance"?
So... "Long live Elon"?
What is it going to be?
Wednesday, April 01, 2015
VA forces vet to get x-ray taken... to prove that his leg is missing
So on the left we have one Chad Fleming, a former soldier who served in the Army Rangers. And as you can see, he has a prosthetic left leg. He sought aid from the Department of Veterans Affairs because... well, you know, that's what they do for men and women who have been in the armed forces.
But in order to determine if Chad was eligible for benefits, Veterans Affairs compelled him to get an x-ray taken of his left stump. This is what the VA required so as to discover if Chad Fleming was truly an amputee.
From the story at TheBlaze...
Chad Fleming, a veteran who served in the 75th Ranger Regiment, says the VA took an X-ray of his artificial leg to prove he was actually an amputee. Though they could have referenced his extensive medical history or just used their eyes, he said, they wasted precious resources taking an X-ray of a leg that "doesn't exist."
"[The doctor] actually laughed," Fleming said. "And I told him, I said, 'You wonder why the country is in such a deficit? It's because you're wasting money taking X-rays of a leg that doesn't exist.' It's like, 'Dude I'm not a starfish. It isn't going to grow back.'"Another veteran in the story went in for a dental appointment, only to be told that he needed to make an appointment to make an appointment to see the dentist.
I could make some snarky commentary about this and how it demonstrates how over-bureacratized and wasteful the government has become... but what would be the point of it? What good could come of it?
Apologies to those I have come to know who work in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Each of you are doing an admirable job in spite of the conditions of not just your department but government in general. That being said: this kind of idiocy is irredeemable. The pennies do add up and in time things like this are an enormous strain on precious resources.
I mean, really: how hard is it to look at a leg that isn't there?
(Thanks to good friend of this blog Dewana Hemric for finding this story and passing it along.)
Friday, July 26, 2013
Senator Burr calls defunding ObamaCare "dumbest idea" ever (this is leadership?)
![]() |
Senator Richard Burr (North Carolina): Part of the problem in D.C. |
From the article at The Hill...
Blocking a government funding bill over ObamaCare is "the dumbest idea I've ever heard," Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) said Thursday.Senator Burr, there are far more important things being threatened by ObamaCare than the federal government. Implementation of the Affordable Care Act is going to cause a lot of private businesses - both large and small - to close up shop because they can't meet the requirements of this legislation. You are also forgetting that ObamaCare is already compelling many companies and other organizations to choose between compromising their beliefs or paying exorbitant and unconscionable penalties to the government.
Burr argued stopping ObamaCare's funding is not going to be achievable as long as President Obama is in the White House, and that Republicans risked taking the blame if they forced the government to shut down over the issue.
"I think it's the dumbest idea I've ever heard," Burr told journalist Todd Zwilich on Thursday. "Listen, as long as Barack Obama is president the Affordable Care Act is gonna be law.
"I think some of these guys need to understand that you shut down the federal government, you better have a specific reason to do it that's achievable," Burr continued. "Defunding the Affordable Care Act is not achievable through shutting down the federal government."
It would be better to have a shutdown of the federal government than to witness a shutdown of hundreds, even thousands of businesses which employ honest and hard-working Americans. Employment is scarce already. It will only plummet further if ObamaCare goes into full effect.
The Affordable Care Act should be fought, and fought, and fought again without yielding. And a person who has sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution will fight ObamaCare, no matter the political cost or what the United States Supreme Court has ruled about it. It wasn't the first time that the Supreme Court has erred terribly, and it won't be the last. The ramifications of ObamaCare will haunt America for generations to come if it is not halted now. A person of foresight and wisdom will do whatever he or she can to keep that from happening. Surrendering to an evil thing... and ObamaCare is an evil thing... is not an act of leadership or wisdom. It is, however, an act of cowardice.
Senator Burr is practically confessing that his loyalty is not to the citizens of North Carolina and all Americans, but to the federal government. By his statements, Burr demonstrates that he gives a higher priority to the status quo of Washington politics than he does to the liberties, the opportunities and the posterity of we the people.
Burr is not an example of true leadership. A true leader does what is right, regardless of popularity or politics. A true leader is a person of conscience, not of convenience or "conventional wisdom".
And Burr is a very poor example of what Republicans profess to stand for. If the GOP is the alleged party of smaller government, it cannot reconcile that claim with capitulating to the largest takeover of a private industry in American history. One that will impede on our freedoms, will drive many into bankruptcy and will diminish the quality of health care in this country. Between this and all the other kowtowing going on in Washington, it's little wonder that an increasing number of Americans see no significant difference between the Democrats and Republicans. For all intents and purposes it is one-party rule pretending to be two. And rolling over on ObamaCare - among many other concerns - is proving it.
If it comes down to choosing either the strength of the federal government or the freedom of the American people, I'll choose the American people every time. So should the members of Congress, and each of their personal political consequence be damned.
Tuesday, July 02, 2013
ObamaCare employer mandate delayed until AFTER next election
Can Obama do that? I mean, I thought the Affordable Care Act was codified law. Seems kinda illegal to invalidate the most sweeping legislation in living memory like that, even if it's only part of it.
I have an idea: let ObamaCare go into full-blown effect now. Let Obama and those who pushed for the Affordable Care Act see what happens. They wanted us to have this, we should give them what they want.
(Don't think for a moment that this isn't about politics. Gotta wonder if the ACA will keep getting punted down the field for the next several elections to come.)
'Course, Obama himself, members of Congress and other government officials have exempted themselves from the Affordable Care Act.
I'll say this: if that's the way it is, then we the people should exempt ourselves as well. If it's not good enough for them, it's obviously not good enough for us either.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Lois Lerner of the IRS: Fifth Amendment for me but not for thee!
Where do these people keep coming from? |
Every year, you and I and millions of other Americans have to file 1040 forms with the IRS. If we don't, we go to jail. If we withhold information on the 1040 forms, we go to jail. If we don't sign the forms, we go to jail. At no time does the IRS afford us the right to invoke the Fifth Amendment so as not to incriminate ourselves.
Lois Lerner in her capacity as a high-ranking official of the Internal Revenue Service is pleading the Fifth to a congressional committee and she expects to get away free and clear from this entire mess.
You and me and everyone else must answer the IRS under threat of perjury. This IRS official doesn't want to answer to our elected representatives and is using the Fifth Amendment as an escape clause which her agency has not and never would afford the average citizen.
If Lerner gets away with this, then she has set a legal precedent and every tax-paying citizen in the United States should follow her example. Come next April 15th, put "I PLEAD THE FIFTH JUST LIKE IRS OFFICIAL LOIS LERNER DID" in big bold red printed letters on your tax form and send that instead.
Remember folks: the Constitution applies to every citizen in this country, not just politicians and their cronies.
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
There is no possible contesting it: The IRS must be abolished
If anybody can tender any argument whatsoever in defense of the Internal Revenue Service, I for one wish to hear what it is.

Audits. Threats. Intimidation. Favoritism toward political allies. Cover-ups. Seizing millions of private individuals' medical records. Bullying a conservative education group to turn over the names of high school and college students. Not even Billy Graham's ministry has proven safe from the IRS.
Our forefathers went to war with England for far, far less than this. They bought our liberty with their blood. Too many of them paid the price for a freedom they knew they would never know but wanted their children and their children's children to have.
We owe their memory better than this.
Yes, Mr. Adams. The time has come to repent in Heaven. The government which you and Jefferson and Franklin and Washington and Madison and Morris and Calhoun and the rest gave us, doesn't exist anymore. We had a republic and we couldn't keep it.
And now we have a "government" of thugs with all the mentality of street hoodlums, or a Mafia family. Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano...
They may have been elected, but they are not leaders. They aren't my leaders, anyway. They are, at most, glorified gangsters. Albeit gangsters with their very own Gestapo. And lots and lots of bullets (which we still haven't been given an adequate explanation for).
The Founding Fathers never would have entertained the notion of a government agency empowered to intimidate and threaten and confiscate the property of the people of the United States... much less approved of one!
So here's how I see it as things stand tonight...
Either the Internal Revenue Service is abolished for good, obliterated totally and its entire structure laid waste. Or, there can be no more confidence and trust that We The People can place with our own government.
This is our Runnymede, folks. King Obama Lackland needs to be dragged kicking and screaming to the pasture and told in no uncertain terms "you've gone mad with power, John. Now sign on the dotted line and get the hell out of our way."
Say what one will for all his faults, but at least King John had enough sense to comprehend what the barons were telling him. But then again John didn't have mega-sized computer databases, airborne drones and a secret police at his beck and call.
Either the IRS goes, and with it all its power and authority (which there is considerable evidence it was never meant to have to begin with), or there is no longer any pretending that we are living in a free nation of the people, by the people, and for the people. There will be only government for the sake of government.
That is not the country I want my children to grow up in.
And you shouldn't want it either.
Friday, February 01, 2013
Homeland Security sez: Fight mass shooters with scissors!
Just when you'd think that the Department of Homeland Security could not possibly prove it's the most useless U.S. government agency in the history of anything... they release this:
So if a carbine-wielding madman bursts into your office or school and starts shooting up the place, fend him off with a pair of scissors! Unless he also has a rock because, you know, rock beats scissors.
Taking this video to its logical extreme, the safest elementary school in America is whichever one gets to have this guy as its School Resource Officer...
No mention in the video about protecting yourself against a gunman with, y'know, a gun.
The New York Post has a great write-up about this latest waste of taxpayer money.
Thursday, December 06, 2012
EVERYONE in U.S. under virtual surveillance by federal government (and why)
What is the "established order" controlling America? Steve McCann at American Thinker has a thorough understanding of it: an entrenched system of career politicians, sellout journalists whose lust for limelight eclipses love of truth, elitist academic types depending on the public treasury to justify their inflated sense of self-important, lobbyists and crony capitalists with a vested interest in making sure things stay the way they are, political hacks...
Corruption looks after itself.
That's why it should come as no surprise that according to a former top encryption analyst with the National Security Agency, the United States government - through the Federal Bureau of Investigation - is compiling the mother of all data mines: a vast repository containing EVERY e-mail, tweet, text message and God knows what else sent by American citizens. WITHOUT the Constitution-mandated search warrants for such a thing.What surprises me however, is that if William Binney is telling is us true, then it represents a brazenness we haven't seen yet from our own government. It's been the understanding of many who have researched such things that for at least the past decade the National Security Agency has employed a system called ECHELON to monitor communications not just within America but throughout the world. Indeed, it's the international scope of ECHELON which has allowed the NSA to keep a listening ear on American at all: ECHELON keeps tabs on phone calls and electronic exchanges between the geographical United States and other countries... which, the government argues, does not require judge-approved warrants. A colossal using the letter of the law to defeat the spirit of the law. Not that that should be a surprise either...
But according to Mr. Binney, our government has taken it to a whole new level of abuse:
The FBI records the emails of nearly all US citizens, including members of congress, according to NSA whistleblower William Binney. In an interview with RT, he warned that the government can use this information against anyone.A long read, but technically rich and altogether persuasive.Binney, one of the best mathematicians and code breakers in the history of the National Security Agency, resigned in 2001. He claimed he no longer wanted to be associated with alleged violations of the Constitution, such as how the FBI engages in widespread and pervasive surveillance through powerful devices called 'Naris.'
(snip)
"...what I’ve been basically saying for quite some time, is that the FBI has access to the data collected, which is basically the emails of virtually everybody in the country. And the FBI has access to it. All the congressional members are on the surveillance too, no one is excluded. They are all included. So, yes, this can happen to anyone. If they become a target for whatever reason – they are targeted by the government, the government can go in, or the FBI, or other agencies of the government, they can go into their database, pull all that data collected on them over the years, and we analyze it all. So, we have to actively analyze everything they’ve done for the last 10 years at least.
(snip)
"It’s everybody. The Naris device, if it takes in the entire line, so it takes in all the data. In fact they advertised they can process the lines at session rates, which means 10-gigabit lines. I forgot the name of the device (it’s not the Naris) – the other one does it at 10 gigabits. That’s why they're building Bluffdale [database facility], because they have to have more storage, because they can’t figure out what’s important, so they are just storing everything there. So, emails are going to be stored there in the future, but right now stored in different places around the country. But it is being collected – and the FBI has access to it."
Why must our government believe it has to look upon We The People as potential enemies to be numbered, catalogued and monitored?
Because to those in power, the established order must be preserved at all cost. Because, again, corruption looks after itself.
Personally, I think Batman had the right idea...
![]() |
Even the Caped Crusader "gets it" (click to enlarge) |
Someday, perhaps this country will crash hard enough to knock the lechers and parasites off of their lofty perch. Perhaps then true leadership will come to serve the American people. There would be few better gestures of faith in the common citizen than to abolish the National Security Agency, reign-in the FBI and give the CIA a good hairy eyeball.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
For the children: "trashcan cameras" and location-tracking chips
Meanwhile the students of Northside Independent School District in Texas are being told to wear ID badges containing location-tracking radio chips on penalty of "suspension, fines, or being involuntary transferred".
Here's an idea: the students should go ahead and wear the badges, but only after putting them in their microwave ovens for a minute or two. THAT oughtta scramble the innards enough to make them useless!
Some good commentary by Fred Reed - the Internet's finest curmudgeon - about the growing "Eye of Sauron" over us, which you can read here.