free speech

EDIT: A good friend sent me this graphic.  It’s as apt for this situation as any other:

 

A recent post on this site has provoked a larger than usual amount of nitwits.  It seems a good time to reiterate some things…

Ever since the start of this blog more than twenty years ago, I have welcomed vigorous discussion and debate in the comments sections of the posts.  I have also allowed for anonymous comments to be made.  My policies about that have been more liberal than a lot of sites on the Intertubes.

Last month, as a result of some people abusing the rules of polite society when commenting, I turned on moderation of comments.  It is now set to publish a comment only after I approve of it.

Many of the comments that had been made were laden with profanity and obscenity.  They were not the writings of ...

Read more

Regarding Murthy v. Missouri: the Supreme Court decision yesterday about government coercing social media companies to censor users’ activity based on political content.  SCOTUS decided that the plaintiffs had no standing and dismissed the lawsuit.

This seems like a colossal victory for the government and social media companies.  HOWEVER…

The case was *not* dismissed.  Today’s ruling dealt with the temporary injunction in the case, not the case itself.  The case was REMANDED, back down the legal chain.  It could still come before the high court where the plaintiffs can better frame their arguments with solid evidence of coercion and censorship.

I believe that such a thing is not only possible, it is almost guaranteed to happen.

Twitter, or X as it’s called now, is going to be VERY interesting to watch as it pertains to the case.  When Murthy v. Missouri was first filed it was confronting ...

Read more

I did not watch President Obama’s inauguration today. There is nothing particularly interesting about a leader with no real vision. Sadly that’s a trait that has been shared by every president since Reagan. But I digress…

It does interest me this afternoon however that President Obama continued the tradition established by former president George W. Bush of having a “free speech zone” marked off for the event…

Freedom Plaza is the site of one of the only authorized demonstration zones, where a strip of the plaza is designated a free speech zone.

The “free speech zones” were a routine and chronic practice of George W. Bush. Nobody who protested his policies was allowed anywhere close to him when he was president and out in public. There were many instances when protestors were limited to an area nearly a mile away from Bush.

The “free speech zones” were wrong then. They ...

Read more

Students at Wright State University who were protesting against Joseph Biden when he visited the campus last week were quarantined a quarter-mile away from the Vice President by the Secret Service. This happened not once, but twice. The rationale given by the Secret Service: they “didn’t want the protesters to be too close to the motorcade.”

Before any Republicans or Romney supporters cry “foul” about this, it would be well to remember that this exact same thing was routine policy during the presidency of George W. Bush! But that fact hasn’t deterred a number of people on “conservative” websites from claiming that the Secret Service is violating the First Amendment, that Obama is violating the Constitution ad nauseum… when Obama’s predecessor, a Republican president, was also insulating himself from public dissent with the very same methods, and on a much more chronic basis. Very many of Bush’s ...

Read more

An item has been placed on the agenda for the August 13th meeting of the Rockingham County Board of Education that, if approved, would limit remarks by private citizens to three minutes or less during public comments portions of the monthly meetings.

The Knight Shift blog received this information from a highly trusted source earlier this evening.

I’ve spent the past good bit of evening trying to find out more about this and I’m going to be making further inquiries come tomorrow morning.

As I’ve come to understand it, here’s what’s going down: at least one and possibly two members of the Board of Education placed this item on the agenda for the next meeting, and it’s quite likely that this is coming as a reaction to what happened at the July 9th meeting. That was when the Board voted to rescind it’s decision in April to implement school ...

Read more

Say what you will of Larry Flynt, but this was high class. And I can’t help but think he’s sincere in saying all of this, in spite of the legal turmoil that went on between him and Jerry Falwell. Here’s the statement he released today after news came out that Falwell had died:

“The Reverend Jerry Falwell and I were arch enemies for fifteen years. We became involved in a lawsuit concerning First Amendment rights and Hustler magazine. Without question, this was my most important battle – the l988 Hustler Magazine, Inc., v. Jerry Falwell case, where after millions of dollars and much deliberation, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in my favor.

My mother always told me that no matter how much you dislike a person, when you meet them face to face you will find characteristics about them that you like. Jerry Falwell was a perfect example of that.

...
Read more