quantum physics

Work with me here.  This is something that popped into being inside my gray matter a few weeks ago.  Personally, I can’t find any argument about how this is not a viable theory.  Although I confess that I did ummm… “borrow” some things from current pop culture.   But as Santa Claus is a character who has borrowed much else across the centuries I think it’s appropriate.

So here it is: my hypothesis for why there are so many Santa Clauses, how Santa gets ALL that work done in a single night, how Santa knows everything about whether you’ve been bad or good.  And that ultimate question: does Santa Claus exist at all?

All right, here we go…

Santa Claus is a multi-universal entity. That’s why we see so many of them at Christmas time. Most of the Santas you’re seeing are from other universes who are in ours for awhile.
...
Read more

Work with me here.  It’s way too late at night, I can’t sleep and this is the kind of thing I think about at this hour.

Here’s the problem: “Does a shadow have mass, and how much does it weigh if it does?”

Remember how in Peter Pan, when Pete loses his shadow and has to sew it back on when he finally catches it?  That’s how this started (though why I was thinking of Peter Pan so randomly is beyond me).  So if Pan loses his shadow, and it gets away from him and he has to catch it and attach it back to himself, then…

Logically, the shadow must have mass.  Because Pan couldn’t take hold of it if it didn’t have mass.  Except it’s impossible for a shadow to have mass, right?  Right?!

Okay, let’s look at this from the angle of physics.  What is a ...

Read more

In the process of investigating a good idea (said process being one that even Stephen Hawking said could destroy the Earth), those wacky boffins in Switzerland are preparing to generate in excess of 5 trillion volts of juice with their Large Hadron Collider in the next few days.  The result could be the creation of miniatures black holes.  But more than that: it could punch a hole through the normal dimension of space-time and allow a peek into universes other than our own.

Reed Richards, take note!

From the article at IGN.com…

CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being fired up this week after a two-year hiatus and a group of scientists think the results could prove the existence of parallel universes.

A paper published by Dr.s Ahmed Farag Ali, Mir Faizal, and Mohammed M. Khalil in the journal Physics Letters B argues that the second run of the LHC

...
Read more

Those clever boffins (as our British brethren love to call such technical folk) at CERN in Switzerland have really made a mess of things this time: they’ve recorded neutrinos traveling faster than the speed of light.

If their determinations hold up, then a whole lotta physics is gonna have to be overhauled. Einstein held that the speed of light in a vacuum was an immutable, impassable barrier, and for most of the past century a lot of our understanding and technology has been based on that. And now… Einstein’s model of relativity stands to be revisited, revised, and possibly amended considerably.

But as with all such announcements, a measure of temperance and consideration is warranted. Jon Butterworth has posted an excellent essay on The Guardian’s website about the ramifications of CERN’s findings, including how it’s possible that neutrinos might not have broken the speed of light.

But if CERN’s ...

Read more

For the past several weeks I’ve been telling my filmmaking partner “Weird” Ed about Primer: the indie sci-fi film from a few years ago and positivalutely the most genius movie about time travel that I’ve ever had the pleasure of watching.

Well, it turns out that filmmaker Shane Carruth might be on to something…

Two physicists at the University of Queensland in Australia have published their theory on the concept of “time teleportation”. If you’re too lazy to read the write-up on the Popular Science website, the gist of it is that Einstein’s “spooky action” not only operates across distances of space but also across measures of time!

Whoa.

Okay well if nothing else, maybe this’ll entice you as well to watch Primer, ‘cuz that movie sure does a much better job at trying to make sense of this than I can at the moment.

‘Course

...
Read more

It had been percolating across my gray matter for the past several weeks. It started when I found myself contemplating certain problems with the forces of gravity and electromagnetism.

About 3:30 a.m. this morning a possible solution was hit upon. Doesn’t look like it’s the re-invention of Wheeler foam. Not yet anyway. I can’t help but think it’s too much like that and at the same time it’s more than a tad different.

I’ll probably be pondering it at length throughout the rest of the day. Particularly as I am reclining in the chair at my friendly neighborhood dentist’s office later this morning.

For now though, my beef with gravity and electromagnetism is satisfied. Until I no doubt wind up chucking the theory out because of one tiny little incongruency that will certainly invalidate the whole thing…

(Why can’t I have a normal mind like everyone else?)...

Read more

The wacky world of quantum mechanics has claimed another victim from the world of common sense. Specifically the equivalence principle long understood to mean that gravitational mass and inertial mass are identical. Einstein was the first to publish about it, building on work already established by Galileo and Newton.

New kids on the block Endre Kajari and his crew at the University of Ulm in Germany have now arrived to bust that all up. They have shown that in the realm of quantum physics, there can be wild variations between gravitational mass and inertial mass.

From the article at MIT’s Technology Review…

Their thinking begins by pointing out the important distinction between kinematics, which is concerned purely with motion not how it arises, and dynamics which focuses on the origin of motion. In the classical world, this has no bearing on the effects of inertial and gravitational mass.

...
Read more

Guess what? You’re immortal! You aren’t going to die. Your life is a quantum wave function that from your point of view is infinite. You may see others die and it’s altogether possible that they may see you die but that is merely relational to the observer. The fact of the matter is, as an observer of your own wave function you can see neither its beginning or its end.

Don’t let anyone else tell you otherwise, either. They’re only seeing their respective wave functions. What the heck do they know?

Mind ya, immortality can be a bit boring after awhile. I can’t help you there. But no doubt you’ll find something to keep you occupied.

Me? I’m going off to become a shrimp boat captain....

Read more

Someday in our foreseeable future, our children will be learning about chemistry with a periodic table that looks something like this…

…no thanks to researchers conducting experiments with the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory.

According to this article at The Register (which reads disturbingly too much like a quantum physics essay written by Alex DeLarge from A Clockwork Orange) the “topflight international reverse-alchemy boffins say they have managed to transmute gold into an entirely new form of ‘negatively strange’ antihypernucleic antimatter, ultra-bizarre stuff which cannot possibly occur naturally – except perhaps inside the cores of collapsed stars.”

In layman’s terms it’s a new form of matter whose strangeness is less than zero but probably not too boring.

I’m currently hopped-up on allergy medicine, and I still have no idea what the hell all of that means....

Read more